|
|
|
|
|
Submitted by Wevv Mang on Monday, October 15, 2007 at 2:56 PM EST
Ridin’ With The Bossman – The Last Triple H Rant and Other Pet Peeves Greetings! Welcome to another edition of Ridin’ With The Bossman! Two columns in two weeks?!? My God, it must be a herald of the coming Apocalypse! You do know that there are only 1,893 days left according to the Mayans don't you? That’s right, December 21, 2012. Around 11 PM. So, make your plans accordingly. And, on another note, Survivor Series is only five weeks away. 10th anniversary of the Montreal Screwjob. Put that on your calendar as well. I got two pieces of feedback that prompted the topic of this column. I enjoyed (and regularly enjoy) your column. I have a question for you - and I understand that you may not have time to answer it - but thought I'd ask anyway. I am somewhat new to following wrestling on the internet so I don't know a lot about the backstage stuff. You mentioned that HHH hates the Rock. My question is, why? I don't know anything about their relationship and I was just hoping you could/would enlighten me. Again, I enjoy reading your stuff. Thanks Taylor Thanks Taylor. I’m not sure if it’s true or not, and my journalistic credibility can take the hit. Luckily, I barely have any, so it’s not a big deal. Yet, it’s something that seems to fit with the pattern of Rock showing up, trying to help some rookie, and then H coming in and squashing that guy. But there are rumors to support the dislike of Rock by H. If rumors are to be believed it started way back in ’97 or ’98, over the IC title. I believe H was to win, and was then told he had to job. H felt that Rock wasn’t worthy, and from there, well, Rock became a huge star, while H was stuck in the midcard. H did break out, and I think Rock, Foley, and Austin all supported his big push in ’98, and that may cause some resentment. Again, my statement is based on rumors, but again, it fits, and that can make it seem true. Wevv, Just read your column you posted on Monday and I have a questions for you. Is bashing H the only thing you can write about? Since H returned from his injury, well since his 'comeback' promos started airing on TV, your columns have been repetitive. H this, H that, H..., H.... You did the same exact thing before his injury. H this, DX that bla bla bla. Why don't you give the man some props, which he deserves??? He came back after a serious injury, for the second time, and has been working his ass off. Yes he has won most of the matches he has been in but isn't that what a face is supposed to do, see Batista, Taker and/or Cena. H should be booked as unstoppable, I mean just look at the guy. He should beat guys like Carlito/London/Kendrick/Shelton, without breaking a sweat. YES he is married to Steph and he is involved in creative meetings but remember Vince still has to approve everything we get to see on TV. I do still enjoy your column sir, even with all the H hate. M* • Not M of Monday Night Countdown and “Enter The Dream Realm Fame”. Unless I’ve been mistaken on his real name. But I believe the answer to that question is no. Just another guy (could be a girl, I guess, don't want to make a ssumptions) who signs his name with an initial. Look folks, I’m going to level with you. The guy has a point. I do rant more than most about H. Hell, at times I seem to be the only one who still stands firm in his convictions about H. But it seems like I repeat myself week after week when it comes to H. You (The reader) are tired of reading it, and I (the writer) am tired of writing it. So, this is going to be my last rant on the subject. No joke, no more, unless something on WWE’s end prods me with something so overblown, I have to write about it. God, I hope not, but this is wrestling, and anything can happen. So, five years of standing my ground, five years of watching H and WWE, five years of pointing out the same damn thing, nearly every single week, only getting a break from it when H gets injured, and even then, the Hand Of H creeps into the programming. Bullshit you say? People, what is H’s job in WWE? Wrestler. True. And CREATIVE TEAM MEMBER AND HEIR TO THE COMPANY. So, this is it, and since I’ve written about so much, perhaps too much, it can be summed up quickly and shortly. So, since this is a rant, I’ll cover some other things about wrestling that are my pet peeves. But first, a little news and humor. HBK Returns I’m sure everyone knows that HBK came back Monday night, and beat up Randy Orton. However, my first reaction when HBK walked out from the back was: “HOLY SHIT! IT’S TED NUGENT!!!!” Yes, the Motor City Madman, Ted Nugent. How could I make such a mistake? Well, I had the volume turned down on the TV, and it was fairly late. But honestly, can you blame me?  Long lost cousin maybe? Pet Peeves These are not in any particular order, but just a list as I thought of them. 1) Bleached Blonde Haircuts I don't know exactly when they started, but it’s a recent thing. As in, it started a few years ago. Since then, it’s become an irregular event. One week a guy has long hair, and then he’s off the air, and then comes back with a crew cut and blonde. If they’re already blonde, they still get the crew cut. Even the stars don't seem immune, but mostly it’s the midcard and opening level guys. It bugs me because not only does it seem like a way to make all the talent look alike, and thus generic. Also privately, I always wonder who the person is that has the fetish for tall muscular guys with short blonde hair, and whether it’s some kind of weird locker room punishment. Personal musings aside, it’s the generalization that bugs me the most. Image is important, not just in wrestling, but in all kinds of jobs that puts said person in a public profile. Whether it be professional sports, entertainment, or even a company spokesman, the way a person looks has an impact. Good looking people are more appealing than bad looking people. Unless the point is to portray a less than perfect looking person. But that’s a whole topic in and of itself, and has spawned an industry all it’s own. In wrestling, it’s about the individual. Even in stables and tag teams. The way a person looks makes that person identifiable, and thus creates an identity separate from the group. No group lasts forever, and when that person breaks off from the group, having their own identity makes it much easier to give that guy an angle, a push, sell his merchandise, and so on and so forth. It also makes it easier for fans, when discussing the show. So, instead of one fan telling another: “Did you see that move that guy did?!? It was amazing!” “Which guy?” “The big blonde guy with short hair.” “ You mean Cade? Or one of the Major Brothers?” “No the other one. You know, he’s got short blond hair. He was wrestling that other blond guy.” A discussion like that can go on for a while. Wrestling is based on personalities. Just look at the Bashams for an example of what can happen to generic wrestlers. #2 – Tag Team Jobbers The first rule in Wevv’s imaginary book of wrestling rules is: Thou Shalt Not Job Out The Tag Team Champions To One Guy Unless the being they’re jobbing to is Godzilla, I can't think of a more pointless booking scenario. Well, there is a point behind it, but I just don't think stroking some one’s ego should come at the expense of your Tag Team Champions being made to look like pussies. No, I am not talking about just H. Undertaker used to beat up the tag team champions on a regular basis. There have been others, but I’m too lazy to look them up. They’re the tag team champions. That means they’re a tag team, and work well together. So well in fact, that they defeated other teams of people. One person should not be a problem. Unless they’re armed with a weapon, and even then, they shouldn't loose. If the lone guy has buddies that run in and help, that’s fine, for a fluke victory, unless the run-n buddy and Lone Guy are part of a tag team, stable, etc. Oh, the loss can be a thing of beauty; with all the near falls a fan can handle, with more reversals than a Russo plot, and enough wrestling to satisfy even an ROH fan. But at the end of the match, there really should be only two kinds of outcome. A win for the tag team, or a fluke DQ win for the Lone Guy, who then runs away from the tag team champions. There are other tag teams who can do the job. Or at least, there should be. If not, well, then, that’s a problem for creative, isn’t it? The damage done to your tag team champions, in terms of credibility of the whole division, and also in terms of individuals, can be greater and last longer than the cheap pop that one guy will get for a win. #3 Bad Sports Entertainment Comedy is tough. It can come easily, and sometimes coming up with a good punchline or a scenario needs to be forced out. Comedy depends on a lot of things, timing, subject matter, the skill of the actors involved, mood of the audience, and other tangible and intangible things. But, in wrestling, you have limits and a long history of what always seems to work and what doesn’t. And the more you do it, the easier it becomes. There is always the danger of running out of material, and burn out, but there’s such a depth of styles that something can always be thrown together. It could be as simple as a pie in the face, or as elaborate as parody, ending with not only a sight gag, but a zinger. When it works well, it’s a thing of art, and just like art, it depends on a person’s taste. But even if they “don't get it” they’ll be able to appreciate it. When it doesn’t, hell, even then if it’s corny enough it might get the same result as a great joke. Again, it depends on a person’s taste. But when it just sucks? Then it’s a tragedy. WWE seems to excel in the sucks part. It’s not that there isn't something good in most attempts. I mean, I can get an idea of what they’re trying to do. It’s when they go in the wrong direction with the joke that just kills me. Drama is hard as well. It’s the other end of the spectrum from comedy, but sometimes, the two can go hand in hand, and overlap each other. Like with comedy, it all depends on a persons taste. Drama, like comedy does have some tried and true plot devices that can be used time after time, and with some slight modifications, a little variation, you can crank out stories. When it works well, it’s beautiful, and when it’s bad drama, there’s always the chance it might turn into comedy, and work as well as intended, just not in the way it was intended, if that makes sense. It’s the middle of the road stuff that sucks. Not qui4te a drama, not quite funny, not quite entertaining period. It’s when I can see the potential and what WWE was trying to do, and then watch it go horribly wrong, that doesn't annoy me. It’s depressing actually. So much wasted potential. I believe that all fans just want to be entertained. And no one is expecting Shakespeare, or Martin Scorsese-like plots. They know it’s wrestling. They’ve lowered their expectations. They just want something good. And the fact that WWE fails more often than it succeeds, well, that’s really depressing. And it says loads about WWE creative. How many writers have they gone through in six years? And what part of the creative department hasn't changed? Hm. I guess that does fit the literal definition of pet peeve. #4 The “USA” Chant Why does this bug me? Is it because I’m not an American? I am, by the way. I’m also a middle-aged, white guy. Sad, isn't it? You will be one too. Unless you’re not white, but you’ll still be middle-aged some day. I can wait. Anyway, it bugs me because it’s become a crutch for wrestling. The “USA” chant is one of the easiest chants to get going. It’s also been done to death. It’s gotten to the point where it’s nothing special. And that’s a damn shame. #5 Not Selling “Death” Spots This has more to do with TNA than it does for WWE. WWE actually does a really good job when it comes to selling the big spot. Sometimes, they go a little too far, like having the guy wrapped up like a mummy the next week, to “show” the fans that the guy is really hurt. Unless you’re a main eventer, and then you just have a little band aid on your forehead. See, I’m old school. If a guy jumps on you from twenty feet (or whatever height the announced says it is) then you don't just pop up and do a similar move. Stay the fuck down for a couple of seconds. Roll around in pain. Move slowly when you get up. THEN do the big revenge spot. A match I saw on TNA a few years ago still bugs me. A bunch of guys doing finisher after finisher, and jumping off a high spot, and then the guys all taking the hits, then springing right up like nothing happened. It was comical. Then to top it off, they tried to sell a DDT as a potential winning move after all that. Just not plausible to me that some one could win with less than a bazooka shot to the skull. It’s gotten better, but every once in a while it pops up, not just in TNA, but in WWE. It’s one thing if your gimmick is to be an unstoppable monster, it’s another to just forget to sell. #6) Blood = match rating +2 stars Too many times I’ve read a comment where some one was praising a match as one of the best ever when I saw the same match and thought it may have been decent, but not that great. I always kept wondering what that person was going on about. Then I realized that it’s the blood in the match, not the actual match itself, which got the person all riled up. It’s a psychological thing. Not as in “That guy (the fan) is bloodthirsty monster and just plain nuts” kind of way, but in a way that says that the person was looking more at the amount of blood spilled, versus the work that went into the match. Blood is an important part of wrestling. It can give a match that extra emotional boost. Yet, sometimes it’s a cop out. It’s telling the difference between the two that gets tricky. A punch kick fest that has a lot of blood vs a match with some chain wrestling, a big spot with blood. The damage can be just as real, no doubt about that. But when I see a slow match, with a lot of punching and kicking and a guy ducks down and gets off camera, I think “that guy is going to blade” and more often than not, it happens. Sometimes, the blood is unintentional, and there’s really nothing that can be done about that. Again, it’s a matter of personal opinion, and there’s really no way to say who’s right or wrong, other than your own thoughts. But I will share a funny story about blading. A couple of years ago, UPN was trying to cut down on the amount of blood shown on Smackdown. There was a short-term ban in fact, of any blood showing up on TV. It still happened, but it was due to accident, not design. When it did, the show would go to black and white. There was this one Undertaker match that may have put an end to the ban, don't know for sure. Undertaker wasn’t allowed to blade his forehead. So, he bladed his fore arm. Now, I’m not picking on Taker with this one, as I think even he had a lot of misgivings about balding his arm, and after it was done, felt stupid for doing so. In fact, while looking back, I thought it might have gone something like this. Undertaker: Can I blade in this match? Creative Team Person: Sorry Taker, UPN doesn't want any blood on TV. Undertaker: Vince, can I blade in this match? Vince: Sorry Taker, but UPN says no. But, I think we can make an exception. Just not too much. Undertaker: What can I do then? Vince: How about the leg? Creative Team Member: Would that show on camera? Hey, how about the arm? Vince:Well, if he cuts himself near the groin, it might look like he’s peeing blood. Might be a good way to sell an internal injury… Undertaker: I’ll cut my arm. #7 Announcer Feuds Well, I just proved myself wrong in the space of a few column pages. Announcer feuds are indeed more pointless than booking the Tag Team Champions to job to a single guy. Announcers don't need to wrestle. Announcers don't need to get over. Just give them a pay raise for announcing, you cheap bastards. See, when an announcer wrestles, he gets paid as a wrestler. It’s what the writers are doing to earn extra money. I’m looking at YOU Chris DeJosephs and Khali Manager Guy! They get paid as talent on top of their writing pay. #8 The Divas Aren’t Wrestlers The hell they’re not! I would much rather see hot chicks than sit through a ten-minute or so bad sports entertainment segment. The women can put on a show, and not just an eye candy match. Though I don't mind those. The women WWE has on their payroll now have far plenty of actual wrestling talent. In particular Melina, Candace, Victoria, Jillian, and Mickie, but even Torrie, Krystal, and Maria can put on passable matches, just as well as Chuck Palumbo, Chris Masters, and Goober and Festus. Honestly, would you rather see a scantily clad Layla or The Face That Symbolizes Inbreeding or Snitsky? I guess it’s just a matter of personal taste. Wrestling has given me some great memories. It’s not just something for me to complain about. But it seems easier to be able to point to the things that annoy me. The good seems more intangible. Perhaps because it’s because the annoying things are easy to single out, while the good things have a more complex origin. Sure, there are some classic promos, and some individual segments that do stand out. But those seem to blend together. Rock promos for one, were nearly always entertaining. Rock had some truly electrifying matches as well. Mick Foley has plenty of great moments as well. Jericho nearly always entertained. I loved Jimmy Wang Yang’s promos and his matches were stellar. Cena had some great moments. From great matches to great wrestling moments. Rock and Hogan facing off? I saw it live, and believe me, it was indeed electrifying. It’s not that the past was better than the present, even though the haze of looking back may make it so. It just seems that there were more of them, and well, wrestling was much hotter back then. That do be a fact. There was plenty bad back then too, that do be a fact as well. It’s just that memory hid most of it. The present offers plenty as well. But it’s more the guys I root for getting a chance to live up to my level of fandom, and from time to time surpass it. I don't know why it seems easier to pick apart than it is to praise. Perhaps, in trying to pin down those certain memories, and put them into words, there’s a risk that it will lessen them. It’s easier to pick fault than it is to praise, because when you start to pull apart a good memory, and say what exactly it is that you liked about it, the bad points tend to stand out as well, and there’s always the risk of some other person coming along and pointing what they didn't like about that segment. So, to keep those happy and pleasant memories intact, scrutinizing them is not a good thing to do. After all, if some one disagrees about something you don't like, it’s just easier to say that they’re wrong, and ignore them, as opposed to fighting for something that you liked. Perhaps, in the long run, you might agree with the person and risk admitting fault and in turn become a target. There’s safety in numbers. But then again, I could be wrong. Triple H, My Final Words Some may call it a grudge. Some may call it living in the past. A holdover from the days when bashing H was “cool”. It’s true. There was a time when the net was filled with H hate. Those days actually were not that long ago. Two years, maybe three, possibly four. Not that long ago at all. In fact, it could be said that there was so much of it, that publicly admitting H fandom was a form of “rebellion” against the “establishment”. But that seems to be a bit too much like forcing the situation into an ‘Us” vs “Them” situation, and it’s more complex than that. I can understand where the H fans are coming from. I can even offer a theory that they like H because when they started watching wrestling, and actually understanding wrestling on a deeper level (changing from mark into smark), H was the guy on top, getting all the attention. H actually put effort into his career back then. He had to work for what he got, not have it handed to him in a casual discussion with his wife and father-in-law on the private jet going to the show. And there were Rock, Foley, and Austin, all working with H, helping him solidify his superstar aura. There are some good things to like about H. I won’t try to say there aren’t. H has talent. It’s just that he never really seems to use that talent to the advantage of WWE. He uses what skills and backstage clout to only help himself. I’ve said it before and I say it still. To me, H is selfish. Not just in booking, and writing, but also in the ring. Let’s go back to No Mercy. H wrestled the harder, in each of the three matches, than he has in any individual match for the past three years, and that’s not including time off. That’s my opinion by the way, and should not be taken as fact. It’s up to you to decide. It wasn’t the quality of his wrestling work that seems to have a sour note with other H critics like myself. It’s the way it was done. The Last Man Standing Match was damn good. In fact, it was so good, it wouldn't have hurt to have been the ONLY title match. The booking logic was there, the match had great intensity and finally, WWE got it right. A Last Man Standing Match has to have a Last Man Standing, and this one did. No Mercy seems to be a flashpoint for H lovers and haters, no doubt about that. The show was good in the presentation, but horrible in the long-term consequences. It’s more about what can be perceived, right or wrong, than in what actually happened. And the core of it all, is H. I’ve gone over my points on why H is bad for wrestling enough times. But here’s the crib notes. - H is married to Steph. Together, they are two of the three Heirs to the WWE empire. Steph is Exectuive Vice President of Talent and Creative Writing. Everything goes through her, and then goes to Vince. Steph plots out the direction of the show, according to guidelines Vince lays out, suggestions, hints, whatever. While Vince may be the guy in charge, and a micromanager, Steph is not just a person with a fancy title and not involved. Steph is a strong willed, ambitious woman, and to think that she’s not involved heavily in what happens on TV is just stupid. It’s also stupid to think that Steph can't influence Vince. Besides being his daughter (And parents know that daughters have a way of influencing Daddy), Steph has worked with Vince closer than anyone. Steph worked as Vince’s assistant before she ever got involved in TV. In other words, Steph worked closely with Vince in the running of the company, and knows what he likes and doesn't like, and how to make him accept something he normally wouldn’t. She’s been around the business for along time. Make no mistake though, Steph is not H’s puppet. She’s a willing accomplice. The two are married after all. - H is a McMahon. Vince likes H, or he never would have allowed him to marry his daughter. Vince also likes H as a wrestler and values H’s opinion when it comes to the wrestling business. H has a role far greater than Undertaker. H and Vince share similar taste when it comes to wrestling. Vince likes big guys, and H likes big guys. Vince likes his big guys to squash smaller guys, and H likes to squash people, period. - H doesn't like to look weak. At all. Call it insecurity, call it an ego, call it what you will. H always comes out on top. Always. H is a smart cookie, no doubt about that. H will get beat down, but in the end, nine times out of ten, H will be the one standing in the ring, getting his heat back, and demeaning his attackers, and be the one looking strong. H may loose a match, but again, H gets his heat back, usually in the span of heartbeats. H knows the business and how to use it to his advantage. He’ll use what mic time he has to put himself over, he’ll get the big comeback spots, and make sure that if his opponent has one too, it’s not better than his. Like last Monday. H got beaten down by Umaga and Randy, and the final seconds of the match were H beating up both guys, in a Hogan like comeback. Making fun of Hogan? You could say that. Or you could say that H knew that if it worked for Hogan, it work for him and if people didn't like it, well, he was making fun of Hogan, right? - H is a member of the creative team. H gets to say what he does, and what others do. Rumors state that H has been booking the WWE title during Cena’s reign. So, Cena winning non-stop has been H’s doing, just as much as Vince. It’s the only way he knows how, just win, and keep on winning. Has Cena’s title reign gone on too long? I think so. But then again, it’s also been said that H was the one going to take the title off of Cena. And wouldn't it be great if H beat the strongest guy in the company? - H is the top guy, according to WWE. No one is bigger than H. H gets pushed at that level, whether he is on TV or not. Back in the day, when H first gained power, everyone and their grandmother pushed H. The announcers would spend entire matches talking about how great H was. Even though H was the bad guy, even the faces kissed his ass. The most glaring moment to me, was when H first took the title from Orton back in 2004. Orton’s response to H’s challenge was saying how great H was and agreeing that H was going to beat him. Pathetic. - H IS the WWE. Speaking out against H is akin to speaking out against the WWE. H must be praised not just on WWE TV, but also in interviews, public appearances, etc. No one is allowed to speak out against H. To do so, is to be labeled a traitor to WWE, and we all know how WWE handles traitors. And with only one company making money in today’s wrestling world, badmouthing the WWE is not a smart career move. The H push is still going strong. Seven years and counting. It’s been changed from “Nothing but H!” to "Everything else and H!” meaning that H now seems to exist on his own plane, alongside, but still slightly above, everything else that happens in WWE. And woe betide those who enter the H Realm. If you’re not Undertaker or Shawn Michaels, you’re in a world of trouble. You might emerge at the same level you went in as, but there’s a greater chance that you’re coming out way lower than you went in. Elevated? HA! H has elevated exactly one person, and that person is Batista. Even that can be debated, as Batista was allowed to gain steam leading up to the confrontation, and H let it stay at that level, and then gave it a nudge over the top. I was a big H fan, back in the day. 1996 through 1999, when the mega H push took full effect. What changed my mind? The self-absorbed lovefest known as the McMahon-Helmsly era. Two big egos running amok can do that. It’s been the same old story for years now, and that seems to be the biggest problem with my H hate. It barely changes each time he comes back. H gets his hype going, comes back, is pushed like a monster, and then squashes everyone. It never seems to live up to the hype. Kind of like Lex Luger and his push in WWE. Once the glamour of the big entrance fades off, all that’s left is what the guy can bring, and well, H can hype himself as much as he wants, but the material just ain’t that good. Seven years of pushing H, and H is nowhere near the level he should be. Seven years of sacrificing to keep H on top, and what has come of it? Hogan still gets all kind of flack for favorably booking himself. Yet, Hogan actually made money. Hogan actually got people interested in the product. Hogan is Hogan, while H is H, and there’s a world of difference between the two. Hogan gets the heat, while H gets off practically scott-free because it’s the trendy thing to do? Bah. But I can see the point of just shutting up about it. It is boring. It is overdone. But the problem lies with H, not with the writers. That’s where the real change has to occur. They have to come up with something that actually entertains the fans. Not just the H fans, however many there may be. And H fans, are you really happy with the way H just does the same thing over and over again? Wouldn't you like to see H actually compete against some one? Not just a bogus feud, where H is obviously indulging his opponent by gracing the same ring with his presence, and the opponent has the slimmest chance of doing better than H on any level. No, I’m talking about an honest competition, where you root for him to win, because you don’t actually know if H is going to win. Where your hero looks vulnerable. Something that hasn't been seen since 1996. That’s all I’m asking for. Give the fans a reason to root for ya H. Heel, Face, it doesn't matter does it? It’s all the same tactics. But that’s a problem for creative to come up with. And guess who happens to be a member of creative? It’s H’s decision, on every level, and H just seems to make decisions I don't agree with. And I put the blame where I think it belongs. On management. Who also happens to be H. The other members of management have shown they are willing to do what’s right for the business and swallow their pride. Steph has stayed off TV, Shane does the job and takes the hits. And Vince. Vince has sacrificed his pride most of all. While Vince needs to be on TV, in a character standpoint, and focal point, he’s done more than the rest. Vince got his head shaved. He got covered in shit. He’s been the butt of many a joke. He’s allowed a level of defiance shown to him on camera, not just from H, but from the rest of the roster. They may pay the price, but the audience knows why, and can accept it. H just gets away with it, period. I suppose it could be said, like Austin used to do. But even Austin got his ass handed to him now and then, and not in some cheap fashion, but a real honest to goodness brutal way. He came out on top, but it was indeed a struggle. Not just a moving from point A to point B, and rushing to point C, where Austin gets his heat back. The Austin-McMahon feud got old though. It lost it’s magic. And attempts to recreate it never got close to the level the first time did. But that’s a topic for another day. And on that note, I think I’ve said enough. H gets a free pass from now on. I’ve said my fill. I going to miss the H bashing. It’s been a good way to vent. And an old reliable writing ploy to take some shots, worth the criticism, I’ve believed, at creative and the way management and creative does their job. H is both, so it was always a good way to do it. And now, I’ll no longer have that. Sigh. Oh well. Life goes on. Maybe, just maybe, a ray of hope will shine through, and things will change. Anything can happen in wrestling. So, maybe H will stop the nonsense and actually try to become a real performer and no longer rely on his five moves of doom. Oh, you thought that was only Cena? Not so. H’s move list. 1) Punch 2) Kick 3) Spinebuster 4) Facebuster knee smash (where he grabs the guys head, puts it on his knee, and drops to a kneeling position) 5) Pedigree If you’re lucky, you might get a DDT or a clothesline in there. Maybe H will use his verbal skills to help make the next batch of wrestling superstars. Always a glimpse of hope. But for now, it’s up to you readers. It’s in your hands to either praise or condemn H. My time on the H soapbox is over. Here’s the mic, do with it what you will. Quick Plugs! RWTB TV # 5 The Truth Is Out There….Really Out There.  LOP Forums The Movie Bar Until next time, Thanks for Readin’ and thanks for Ridin’ Wevv Mang Please label all feedback as FEEDBACK. mrwevv@mac.com *NEW GALLERY* An XTREME Catfight with Sunny, Payton Banks and ROH's Lacey! WOW!
[Back to LOP] [News Archives] [Results] [Columns] [Forums]
|
|